Alphabetical Menu
Chronological Menu

Reviews for February 15th, 2023

Marlowe

Directed by Neil Jordan




      In 1930's Bay City, Clare Cavendish (Diane Kruger) hires Philip Marlowe (Liam Neeson) to investigate the disappearance of former lover, Nico Peterson (Francois Arnaud), whom she believes might still be alive somewhere. Among the suspects Detective Marlow interviews are Clare's mother, Dorothy (Jessica Lange), and a club manager, Floyd Hanson (Danny Huston).

      Based on the novel by John Banville, the screenplay by William Monahan deftly blends suspense, intrigue and thrills. The less you know about the plot beforehand, the better because there are plenty of twists and turns. Detective Marlowe doesn't trust anyone who he meets, and neither will you. Dorothy might be hiding a dark secret and so could Clare as well as Floyd and other characters introduced later on. As the plot progresses, it becomes increasingly complex and captivating without being too confusing or convoluted. Exposition is handled in a very effective way because the audience knows as much as Detective Marlowe does, for the most part. When he first meets Clare, the audience doesn't quite know what her relationship with Nico was before he went missing.

      Fortunately, screenwriter William Monahan and director Neil Jordan don't forget to ground the film in humanity by bringing some of the characters to life, so Marlowe is a noir crime thriller that's concurrently plot and character-driven. Bravo to them for trusting the audience's intelligence and emotions while keeping the narrative focused and compelling. Marlowe comes across as a tough, smart and cunning detective worth rooting for and caring about as a human being. The dynamics between him and Clare remain fascinating as the mystery unfolds. You'll also find dry humor and wit in the dialogue, so the film avoids becoming monotonous, pedestrian and lethargic. Yes, the plot does have some clichés, but so what? There's nothing inherently wrong with clichés. Many great noir films like L.A. Confidential and Chinatown use clichés. It's much more important how a film uses clichés and whether or not the beats land. In Marlowe, the beats do indeed land, even during the riveting third act that's filled with shocking surprises.

      The ensemble cast of Marlowe is terrific and helps to invigorate the film. Liam Neeson exudes plenty of charisma and panache in the role of Philip Marlowe. He's very well-cast. The same can be said for Diane Kruger, Jessica Lange, Danny Huston and, in a smaller, but significant roles, Alan Cumming and Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje. Everything from the set design to the lighting, hair & make-up, and costume design are exquisite and enrich the film with style which, in turn, becomes part of the film's substance. At a running time of 1 hour and 50 minutes, Marlowe is a smart, stylish and gripping crime thriller. Liam Neeson is in top form. It's destined to be the next film noir classic.

  

Number of times I checked my watch: 1
Released by Open Road Films.
Opens nationwside.

Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey

Directed by Rhys Frake-Waterfield




      Five years after he went off to college, Christopher Robin (Nikolai Leon) returns to the Hundred Acre Woods with his wife Mary (Paula Coiz). Little do they know that Winnie-the-Pooh (Craig David Dowsett) and Piglet (Chris Cordell) have become serial killers. After Pooh kills Christopher's wife, he and Piglet find more people to terrorize: Maria (Maria Taylor) and her friends who spend time at an isolated cabin in the woods.

      Let's face it. No one goes to a B-horror movie expecting an intriguing plot, complex characters or emotional depth. Even logic, plausibility and reason can be thrown out of the window as long as it's a guilty pleasure that's scary, suspenseful, campy and/or outrageously funny. Unfortunately, the screenplay by Rhys Frake-Waterfield doesn't manage to be scary, suspenseful, campy nor outrageously funny enough to be a guilty pleasure. There aren't even any bad laughs to make it unintentionally funny. The concept of a killer Winnie-the-Pooh and Piglet is quite subversive and even funny in theory, especially knowing that they killed and ate Eeyore. In the way that it's executed, though, no pun intended, it falls flat. This film is a harsh lesson to all indie filmmakers that you can have interesting ideas, but if you don't use the ideas in a way that's entertaining and don't know where to take the ideas to, it's not going to work regardless of the budget. Not a single scene generates any palpable tension or chills, even when Pooh chases one of his victims through the woods. If Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey didn't take itself so seriously, perhaps it would've been more fun or at least amusing the watch. What ensues is a repetitive, lazy and lethargic bore that quickly runs out of steam.

      The production values are surprisingly decent, for the most part, with some atmospheric settings, but the music score feels a bit overbearing. There's also a nauseating scene when the camera shakes as a victim runs through the woods. Many scenes are shot in the dark and sometimes it's hard to see what's happening. Moreover, the kills aren't impressive though nor do they push the envelope enough--one victim gets stabbed in the mouth, but it's not even remotely scary or shocking. The editing also leaves a lot to be desired because it's occasionally choppy. The best thing about Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey is that it's only 1 hour and 24 minutes, so it's not a chore to sit through like Terrifier 2 which clocks at 2 hours and 20 minutes. Nonetheless, it's still a disappointing, squandered opportunity to turn a beloved children's classic into a bonkers, wildly entertaining cult classic for adults.
  

Number of times I checked my watch: 3
Released by Fathom Events.
Opens nationwside.